GTOS vs SCHQ
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. GTOS delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | SCHQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $803M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 4.91% | |
| Holdings | 703 | 100 | |
| YTD Return | -0.75% | -2.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.23% | +0.09% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.69% | +0.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -7.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 13.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -46.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Oct 10, 2019 |
GTOS vs SCHQ Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF (SCHQ) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GTOS returned +1.23% while SCHQ returned +0.09%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.75% versus a loss of 2.72% for SCHQ.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.69% per year against +0.91% for SCHQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.29% annualized vs -4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -46.7% for SCHQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while SCHQ charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.52% against 4.91% for SCHQ.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and SCHQ share 0 holdings out of 351 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or SCHQ?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or SCHQ?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.23% vs +0.09% for SCHQ, so GTOS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.29% vs -4.41% for SCHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or SCHQ?
SCHQ has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs SCHQ -46.7%.
Should I hold both GTOS and SCHQ?
GTOS and SCHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and SCHQ?
GTOS and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 351 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or SCHQ?
GTOS yields 4.52% while SCHQ yields 4.91%, so SCHQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.