HCOM vs HUSV
HCOM vs HUSV
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. HUSV delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $9M | $74M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 1.37% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +8.58% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.90% | +5.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.95% | +9.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.8% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Aug 24, 2016 |
HCOM vs HUSV Performance
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% while HUSV returned +5.89%. Year to date, HCOM is up 0.71% versus a gain of 8.58% for HUSV.
Over three years, HCOM compounded at -6.95% per year against +9.95% for HUSV. Across the full 4-year window we track, HUSV has the edge at +8.52% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 13.2% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for HCOM and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HCOM charges 0.59% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $70 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HCOM currently yields 10.95% against 1.37% for HUSV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HCOM or HUSV?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while HUSV charges 0.70%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HCOM or HUSV?
Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% vs +5.89% for HUSV, so HUSV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HCOM annualized +0.68% vs +8.52% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HCOM or HUSV?
HCOM has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 13.2% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: HCOM -28.8% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both HCOM and HUSV?
HCOM and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, HCOM or HUSV?
HCOM yields 10.95% while HUSV yields 1.37%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.