HCOM vs SAWS
HCOM vs SAWS
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $9M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.90% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.95% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.8% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Jul 30, 2024 |
HCOM vs SAWS Performance
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% while SAWS returned +25.78%. Year to date, HCOM is up 0.71% versus a gain of 16.18% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for HCOM and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HCOM charges 0.59% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $55 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HCOM currently yields 10.95% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HCOM or SAWS?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HCOM or SAWS?
Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% vs +25.78% for SAWS, so SAWS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), HCOM annualized +0.68% vs +13.57% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HCOM or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: HCOM -28.8% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Which pays a higher dividend, HCOM or SAWS?
HCOM yields 10.95% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.