HCOM vs TYLG
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 59 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $9M | $14M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 7.86% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +21.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.90% | +34.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.95% | +23.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.8% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Commodity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Nov 21, 2022 |
HCOM vs TYLG Performance
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% while TYLG returned +34.00%. Year to date, HCOM is up 0.71% versus a gain of 21.67% for TYLG.
Over three years, HCOM compounded at -6.95% per year against +23.41% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.46% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for HCOM and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HCOM charges 0.59% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $60 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HCOM currently yields 10.95% against 7.86% for TYLG.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HCOM or TYLG?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while TYLG charges 0.60%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HCOM or TYLG?
Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% vs +34.00% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HCOM annualized +0.68% vs +25.46% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HCOM or TYLG?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: HCOM -28.8% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both HCOM and TYLG?
HCOM and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of -0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, HCOM or TYLG?
HCOM yields 10.95% while TYLG yields 7.86%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.