HDEF vs VTI

HDEF vs VTI

Which is better, HDEF or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHDEFVTI
Expense Ratio0.09%0.03%Best
AUM$2.2B$690.1B
Dividend Yield3.69%1.03%
Holdings2463,524
YTD Return+6.69%+13.35%Best
1Y Return+12.84%+15.92%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+18.42%+23.41%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+12.21%+12.83%Best
Volatility (annualized)14.7%Best15.5%
Max Drawdown-38.2%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$17,789$18,286Best
Top 10 Weight41.1%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyXtrackers ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 12, 2015May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 18, 2015 to Oct 2, 2026 (11.1 years).

HDEF vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.1 years both funds cover.

HDEF vs VTI Performance

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HDEF returned +12.84% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, HDEF is up 6.69% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Over three years, HDEF compounded at +18.42% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.21% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +4.96%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.7% for HDEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.2% for HDEF and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HDEF charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HDEF currently yields 3.69% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 112 holdings in HDEF and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.1% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, HDEF as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 112 positions we hold weights for in HDEF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 246 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for HDEF (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for HDEF that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of HDEF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

HDEFVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HDEF or VTI?

HDEF has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, HDEF or VTI?

Over the past year HDEF returned +12.84% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), HDEF annualized +4.96% vs +12.66% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, HDEF or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.7% for HDEF. Worst drawdown: HDEF -38.2% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both HDEF and VTI?

HDEF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, HDEF or VTI?

HDEF yields 3.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so HDEF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than HDEF?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.