HEAL vs VYM
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HEAL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $32M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -0.80% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | -8.15% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.44% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.43% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
HEAL vs VYM Performance
Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HEAL returned -8.15% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, HEAL is down 0.80% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, HEAL compounded at -1.44% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -11.43% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs -7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HEAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.8% for HEAL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HEAL charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEAL currently yields 0.27% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
HEAL and VYM share 0 holdings out of 642 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HEAL or VYM?
HEAL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HEAL or VYM?
Over the past year HEAL returned -8.15% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), HEAL annualized -7.49% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HEAL or VYM?
HEAL has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HEAL -65.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both HEAL and VYM?
HEAL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HEAL and VYM?
HEAL and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 642 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HEAL or VYM?
HEAL yields 0.27% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.