HEGD vs IVV
HEGD vs IVV
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HEGD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.87% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $707M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.81% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.50% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.75% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.45% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Swan Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 22, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
HEGD vs IVV Performance
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) is a ETF from Swan Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HEGD returned +14.50% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, HEGD is up 7.81% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, HEGD compounded at +13.75% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.45% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, HEGD has the edge at +9.74% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.7% for HEGD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for HEGD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HEGD charges 0.87% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $3 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEGD currently yields 0.34% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HEGD and IVV share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HEGD or IVV?
HEGD has an expense ratio of 0.87% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HEGD or IVV?
Over the past year HEGD returned +14.50% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), HEGD annualized +9.74% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HEGD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.7% for HEGD. Worst drawdown: HEGD -14.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HEGD and IVV?
HEGD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between HEGD and IVV?
HEGD and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HEGD or IVV?
HEGD yields 0.34% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.