HYHG vs VYM

HYHG vs VYM

Which is better, HYHG or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHYHGVYM
Expense Ratio0.50%0.04%Best
AUM$203M$81.6B
Dividend Yield6.66%2.22%
Holdings241613
YTD Return+0.39%+12.87%Best
1Y Return+1.51%+17.25%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+6.80%+17.66%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+5.97%+11.98%Best
Volatility (annualized)7.3%Best13.4%
Max Drawdown-25.7%Best-35.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$13,363$17,608Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Value
InceptionMay 21, 2013Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 23, 2013 to Sep 15, 2026 (13.3 years).

HYHG vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.3 years both funds cover.

HYHG vs VYM Performance

ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged ETF (HYHG) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HYHG returned +1.51% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, HYHG is up 0.39% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.

Over three years, HYHG compounded at +6.80% per year against +17.66% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.97% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.30% annualized vs +3.81%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 7.3% for HYHG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.7% for HYHG and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HYHG charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HYHG currently yields 6.66% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of HYHG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

HYHGVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HYHG or VYM?

HYHG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, HYHG or VYM?

Over the past year HYHG returned +1.51% vs +17.25% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), HYHG annualized +3.81% vs +9.30% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, HYHG or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 7.3% for HYHG. Worst drawdown: HYHG -25.7% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both HYHG and VYM?

HYHG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, HYHG or VYM?

HYHG yields 6.66% while VYM yields 2.22%, so HYHG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than HYHG?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.