IBDR vs IVV
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBDR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.12% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 264 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.90% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.78% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.21% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.55% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 13, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
IBDR vs IVV Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IBDR returned +3.78% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, IBDR is up 1.90% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, IBDR compounded at +5.21% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.55% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.6% for IBDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.1% for IBDR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBDR charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBDR currently yields 4.12% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IBDR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 728 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBDR or IVV?
IBDR has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBDR or IVV?
Over the past year IBDR returned +3.78% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IBDR annualized +1.55% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBDR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.6% for IBDR. Worst drawdown: IBDR -16.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IBDR and IVV?
IBDR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBDR and IVV?
IBDR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 728 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBDR or IVV?
IBDR yields 4.12% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IBDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.