IBDX vs IVV
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBDX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.85% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 424 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.08% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.71% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.56% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
IBDX vs IVV Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF (IBDX) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IBDX returned +2.71% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, IBDX is up 0.08% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, IBDX compounded at +6.56% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.5% for IBDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.5% for IBDX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBDX charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBDX currently yields 4.85% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBDX or IVV?
IBDX has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBDX or IVV?
Over the past year IBDX returned +2.71% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBDX annualized +4.51% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBDX or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.5% for IBDX. Worst drawdown: IBDX -12.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IBDX and IVV?
IBDX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBDX and IVV?
IBDX and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBDX or IVV?
IBDX yields 4.85% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IBDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.