IBHF vs SCHD
iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, IBHF or SCHD?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBHF | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $754M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.01% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 113 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -2.38% | +21.73%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.00% | +26.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.42% | +16.02%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.98% | +9.26%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0%Best | 14.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.2%Best | -16.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,581 | $15,571Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.9% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2020 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 12, 2020 to Sep 25, 2026 (5.9 years).
IBHF vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
IBHF vs SCHD Performance
iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IBHF returned -2.00% while SCHD returned +26.35%. Year to date, IBHF is down 2.38% versus a gain of 21.73% for SCHD.
Over three years, IBHF compounded at +5.42% per year against +16.02% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +2.98% and +9.26% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.55% annualized vs +3.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 5.0% for IBHF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.2% for IBHF and -16.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBHF charges 0.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $6 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBHF currently yields 6.01% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 92 holdings in IBHF and 100 in SCHD, totalling 98.4% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 92 positions we hold weights for in IBHF and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 113 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for IBHF (99.9% of the fund), and 92 for IBHF that do not appear in SCHD (98.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBHF and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBHF or SCHD?
IBHF has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IBHF or SCHD?
Over the past year IBHF returned -2.00% vs +26.35% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IBHF annualized +3.69% vs +12.55% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IBHF or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 5.0% for IBHF. Worst drawdown: IBHF -11.2% vs SCHD -16.9%.
Should I hold both IBHF and SCHD?
IBHF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBHF or SCHD?
IBHF yields 6.01% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so IBHF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than IBHF?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.