IBMP vs VYM
Ishares Ibonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBMP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $653M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.50% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 1,824 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -0.20% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.46% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.48% | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.19% | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 9, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IBMP vs VYM Performance
Ishares Ibonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBMP returned +0.46% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, IBMP is down 0.20% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Over three years, IBMP compounded at +2.48% per year against +18.29% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.19% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.08% annualized vs +1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 4.4% for IBMP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for IBMP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBMP charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBMP currently yields 2.50% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
IBMP and VYM share 0 holdings out of 870 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBMP or VYM?
IBMP has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBMP or VYM?
Over the past year IBMP returned +0.46% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IBMP annualized +1.65% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBMP or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 4.4% for IBMP. Worst drawdown: IBMP -15.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IBMP and VYM?
IBMP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBMP and VYM?
IBMP and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 870 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBMP or VYM?
IBMP yields 2.50% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.