IBMU vs QQQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Muni Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, IBMU or QQQ?
IBMU and QQQ are close on what we can measure.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBMU | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Tie | 0.18%Tie |
| AUM | $17M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 391 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -1.54% | +15.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.26% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IBMU vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBMU vs QQQ Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, IBMU is down 1.54% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBMU charges 0.18% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $18 annually. On income, IBMU currently yields 0.81% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 96 holdings in IBMU and 102 in QQQ, totalling 20.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in IBMU and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 391 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBMU and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBMU or QQQ?
IBMU has an expense ratio of 0.18% while QQQ charges 0.18%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBMU or QQQ?
IBMU yields 0.81% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IBMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than IBMU?
IBMU and QQQ are close on every measure we can compare. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.