IG vs PATN
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 145 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $198M | $194M | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 1.59% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 106 | |
| YTD Return | -1.86% | +28.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.54% | +52.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.74% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.77% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0% | 21.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2018 | Sep 16, 2024 |
IG vs PATN Performance
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IG returned +0.54% while PATN returned +52.00%. Year to date, IG is down 1.86% versus a gain of 28.99% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 8.0% for IG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for IG and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IG charges 0.19% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $65 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IG currently yields 5.07% against 1.59% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
IG and PATN share 0 holdings out of 246 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IG or PATN?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while PATN charges 0.65%. IG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IG or PATN?
Over the past year IG returned +0.54% vs +52.00% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IG annualized +0.55% vs +37.50% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IG or PATN?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 8.0% for IG. Worst drawdown: IG -23.8% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both IG and PATN?
IG and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IG and PATN?
IG and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 246 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IG or PATN?
IG yields 5.07% while PATN yields 1.59%, so IG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.