PATN vs VXUS
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, PATN or VXUS?
PATN has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PATN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $287M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 108 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +28.78%Best | +12.82% |
| 1Y Return | +41.11%Best | +19.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.46% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $18,260Best | $14,520 |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2 years).
PATN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
PATN vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PATN returned +41.11% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, PATN is up 28.78% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 12.2% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for PATN and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PATN charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PATN currently yields 1.67% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 57.1% of PATN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
72 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in PATN and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 108 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PATN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc | 5.27% | 1.41% | 3.86% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 4.51% | 1.42% | 3.09% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N | 2.50% | 0.65% | 1.85% |
| 9988:HKAlibaba Group Holding Ltd | 2.27% | 0.62% | 1.65% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 2.10% | 0.58% | 1.52% |
| NN:ASNn Group Nv | 2.19% | 0.06% | 2.13% |
| SU:PASchneider Electric | 1.79% | 0.41% | 1.38% |
| OREP:PAL'Oreal Sa | 2.03% | 0.15% | 1.88% |
| ABBN:SMABB Ltd. - Ordinary Shares | 1.59% | 0.34% | 1.25% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd | 1.56% | 0.33% | 1.23% |
57.1% of PATN is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PATN or VXUS?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PATN or VXUS?
Over the past year PATN returned +41.11% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PATN annualized +35.13% vs +20.50% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PATN or VXUS?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 12.2% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PATN -16.8% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both PATN and VXUS?
PATN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PATN and VXUS?
At least 57.1% of PATN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 72 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in PATN and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, PATN or VXUS?
PATN yields 1.67% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than PATN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PATN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.