IGBH vs TYLG
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 4,130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGBH | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $233M | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.62% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 4,130 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +2.18% | +21.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.92% | +35.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.66% | +23.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.45% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.9% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2015 | Nov 21, 2022 |
IGBH vs TYLG Performance
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IGBH returned +5.92% while TYLG returned +35.64%. Year to date, IGBH is up 2.18% versus a gain of 21.18% for TYLG.
Over three years, IGBH compounded at +7.66% per year against +23.66% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.12% annualized vs +2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 7.5% for IGBH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.9% for IGBH and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGBH charges 0.14% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $60 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGBH currently yields 5.62% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
IGBH and TYLG share 0 holdings out of 150 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGBH or TYLG?
IGBH has an expense ratio of 0.14% while TYLG charges 0.60%. IGBH is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGBH or TYLG?
Over the past year IGBH returned +5.92% vs +35.64% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IGBH annualized +2.91% vs +25.12% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGBH or TYLG?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 7.5% for IGBH. Worst drawdown: IGBH -38.9% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both IGBH and TYLG?
IGBH and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGBH and TYLG?
IGBH and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 150 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGBH or TYLG?
IGBH yields 5.62% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.