IGSB vs IVV
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGSB offers more diversification with 3933 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGSB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22.9B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.56% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4,645 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.66% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.94% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.68% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.50% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 5, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
IGSB vs IVV Performance
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGSB returned +2.94% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, IGSB is up 0.66% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, IGSB compounded at +5.68% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.50% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.7% for IGSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.4% for IGSB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGSB charges 0.04% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGSB currently yields 4.56% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IGSB and IVV share 4 holdings out of 4434 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGSB or IVV?
IGSB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGSB or IVV?
Over the past year IGSB returned +2.94% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IGSB annualized +1.13% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGSB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.7% for IGSB. Worst drawdown: IGSB -13.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGSB and IVV?
IGSB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGSB and IVV?
IGSB and IVV share 4 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4434 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGSB or IVV?
IGSB yields 4.56% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IGSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.