IJT vs IVV
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IJT or IVV?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IJT led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IJT is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.71% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 390 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.86%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +14.41% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.46% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.72% | +13.51%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.0% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,206 | $18,844Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.9%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 28, 2000 to Sep 18, 2026 (26.1 years).
IJT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.1 years both funds cover.
IJT vs IVV Performance
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IJT returned +14.41% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, IJT is up 14.86% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, IJT compounded at +14.46% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.72% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IJT has the edge at +8.70% annualized vs +6.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.0% for IJT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJT charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IJT currently yields 0.71% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.8% of IJT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings IJT also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 351 positions we hold weights for in IJT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 390 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IJT (98.5% of the fund), and 340 for IJT that do not appear in IVV (96.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IJT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.75% | 0.15% | 0.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IJT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJT or IVV?
IJT has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IJT or IVV?
Over the past year IJT returned +14.41% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IJT annualized +8.70% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IJT or IVV?
IJT has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IJT -58.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IJT and IVV?
IJT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJT or IVV?
IJT yields 0.71% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IJT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IJT led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IJT is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.