IJUL vs IMAY
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July vs Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May
Which is better, IJUL or IMAY?
IJUL has been ahead.
IJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJUL | IMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $251M | $50M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +7.17%Best | +5.96% |
| 1Y Return | +10.56%Best | +9.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.37% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.12% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 6.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3%Best | -9.4% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,252Best | $12,856 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2019 | May 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.5 years).
IJUL vs IMAY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IJUL vs IMAY Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IJUL returned +10.56% while IMAY returned +9.73%. Year to date, IJUL is up 7.17% versus a gain of 5.96% for IMAY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.7% compared with 6.4% for IMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for IJUL and -9.4% for IMAY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJUL charges 0.85% per year while IMAY charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, IJUL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for IMAY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IJUL and IMAY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJUL or IMAY?
IJUL has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IMAY charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, IJUL or IMAY?
Over the past year IJUL returned +10.56% vs +9.73% for IMAY, so IJUL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IJUL or IMAY?
IJUL has been the more volatile fund at 6.7% annualized versus 6.4% for IMAY. Worst drawdown: IJUL -8.3% vs IMAY -9.4%.
Should I hold both IJUL and IMAY?
IJUL and IMAY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJUL or IMAY?
IJUL yields 0.00% while IMAY yields 0.00%, so IMAY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IMAY better than IJUL?
IJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.