INCE vs SAWS
INCE vs SAWS
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
INCE has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INCE | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $132M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.82% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +15.94% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.30% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.63% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.93% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | Jul 30, 2024 |
INCE vs SAWS Performance
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year INCE returned +26.30% while SAWS returned +25.78%. Year to date, INCE is up 15.94% versus a gain of 16.18% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for INCE and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INCE charges 0.29% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $55 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INCE currently yields 4.82% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
INCE and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 118 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INCE or SAWS?
INCE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SAWS charges 0.55%. INCE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INCE or SAWS?
Over the past year INCE returned +26.30% vs +25.78% for SAWS, so INCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), INCE annualized +12.53% vs +13.57% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INCE or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: INCE -34.1% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both INCE and SAWS?
INCE and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INCE and SAWS?
INCE and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 118 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INCE or SAWS?
INCE yields 4.82% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so INCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.