INCE vs IVV
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INCE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $132M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.08% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.26% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.92% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.94% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
INCE vs IVV Performance
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year INCE returned +24.26% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, INCE is up 17.08% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, INCE compounded at +16.92% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.94% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, INCE has the edge at +12.62% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for INCE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INCE charges 0.29% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INCE currently yields 4.82% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
INCE and IVV share 38 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INCE or IVV?
INCE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INCE or IVV?
Over the past year INCE returned +24.26% vs +22.02% for IVV, so INCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), INCE annualized +12.62% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INCE or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: INCE -34.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both INCE and IVV?
INCE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between INCE and IVV?
INCE and IVV share 38 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INCE or IVV?
INCE yields 4.82% while IVV yields 1.09%, so INCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.