IOCT vs SCHD

IOCT vs SCHD

Which is better, IOCT or SCHD?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIOCTSCHD
Expense Ratio0.85%0.06%Best
AUM$169M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%3.00%
Holdings12103
YTD Return+8.36%+23.46%Best
1Y Return+11.33%+27.20%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.66%+15.41%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.67%+10.16%Best
Volatility (annualized)8.7%Best14.9%
Max Drawdown-16.9%Tie-16.9%Tie
$10,000 over 5 years$15,155$16,223Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 1, 2021Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5 years).

IOCT vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.

IOCT vs SCHD Performance

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - October (IOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IOCT returned +11.33% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, IOCT is up 8.36% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.

Over three years, IOCT compounded at +12.66% per year against +15.41% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.67% and +10.16% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 8.7% for IOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for IOCT and -16.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IOCT charges 0.85% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $6 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IOCT currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IOCT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IOCTSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IOCT or SCHD?

IOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IOCT or SCHD?

Over the past year IOCT returned +11.33% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IOCT or SCHD?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 8.7% for IOCT. Worst drawdown: IOCT -16.9% vs SCHD -16.9%.

Should I hold both IOCT and SCHD?

IOCT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IOCT or SCHD?

IOCT yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than IOCT?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.