IQI vs VYM

IQI vs VYM

Which is better, IQI or VYM?

Municipal Bond against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIQIVYM
Expense Ratio1.71%0.04%Best
AUM$3,048.42$81.6B
Dividend Yield7.77%2.22%
Holdings485613
YTD Return+4.18%+13.91%Best
1Y Return+7.27%+17.57%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+10.93%+18.12%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.29%+12.17%Best
Volatility (annualized)12.9%Best14.5%
Max Drawdown-53.7%Best-58.8%
$10,000 over 5 years$9,856$17,758Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryTax PreferredEquity
StyleMunicipal BondLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 29, 1992Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.8 years).

IQI vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.

IQI vs VYM Performance

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust (IQI) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IQI returned +7.27% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, IQI is up 4.18% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.

Over three years, IQI compounded at +10.93% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.29% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.95% annualized vs -0.20%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.9% for IQI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for IQI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IQI charges 1.71% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $171 vs $4 annually, a gap of $167 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQI currently yields 7.77% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IQI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IQIVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IQI or VYM?

IQI has an expense ratio of 1.71% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $167 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IQI or VYM?

Over the past year IQI returned +7.27% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IQI annualized -0.20% vs +6.95% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IQI or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.9% for IQI. Worst drawdown: IQI -53.7% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both IQI and VYM?

IQI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IQI or VYM?

IQI yields 7.77% while VYM yields 2.22%, so IQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than IQI?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.