ISEP vs IVV
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ISEP or IVV?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISEP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $64M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 12 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.73% | +13.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.73% | +18.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.17% | +23.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $14,170 | $17,946Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 1, 2023 to Sep 25, 2026 (3.1 years).
ISEP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
ISEP vs IVV Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September (ISEP) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ISEP returned +11.73% while IVV returned +18.57%. Year to date, ISEP is up 7.73% versus a gain of 13.85% for IVV.
Over three years, ISEP compounded at +13.17% per year against +23.50% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 7.5% for ISEP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for ISEP and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISEP charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISEP currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ISEP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISEP or IVV?
ISEP has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISEP or IVV?
Over the past year ISEP returned +11.73% vs +18.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISEP or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 7.5% for ISEP. Worst drawdown: ISEP -7.4% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both ISEP and IVV?
ISEP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISEP or IVV?
ISEP yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ISEP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.