ISRA vs VTI
VanEck Israel ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ISRA or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ISRA led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISRA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $147M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.53%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +30.50%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.43%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.59% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,099 | $17,908Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2013 to Sep 18, 2026 (13.2 years).
ISRA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.2 years both funds cover.
ISRA vs VTI Performance
VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ISRA returned +30.50% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, ISRA is up 13.53% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, ISRA compounded at +27.43% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.59% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.79% annualized vs +8.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISRA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.0% for ISRA and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISRA charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISRA currently yields 1.31% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
22.3% of ISRA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's money is in holdings ISRA also owns.
ISRA and VTI share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in ISRA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 81 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,144 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ISRA (97.0% of the fund), and 11 for ISRA that do not appear in VTI (7.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISRA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 13.16% | 0.38% | 12.78% |
| FROGJfrog Ltd | 2.22% | 0.01% | 2.21% |
| SSentinelOne Inc | 1.48% | 0.01% | 1.47% |
| VRNSVaronis Systems Inc | 1.10% | 0.01% | 1.09% |
| ORAOrange - Adr | 1.02% | 0.01% | 1.01% |
| ONDSOndas Holdings Inc. | 0.89% | 0.01% | 0.88% |
| LMNDLemonade Inc | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
| PAYOTC1I11QN2 | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.61% |
| NVCRNovocure Limited Ordinary Shares | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.53% |
| OPKOpko Health Inc | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.42% |
22.3% of ISRA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISRA or VTI?
ISRA has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISRA or VTI?
Over the past year ISRA returned +30.50% vs +16.08% for VTI, so ISRA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ISRA annualized +8.94% vs +12.79% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISRA or VTI?
ISRA has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ISRA -45.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ISRA and VTI?
ISRA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ISRA and VTI?
22.3% of ISRA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's is in holdings ISRA also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in ISRA and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISRA or VTI?
ISRA yields 1.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ISRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ISRA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ISRA led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.