ISTM vs IVV
iShares Strategic Metals ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ISTM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISTM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.27% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +49.67% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.91% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
ISTM vs IVV Performance
iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ISTM returned +49.67% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ISTM is up 7.98% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ISTM compounded at +34.91% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, ISTM has the edge at +34.91% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for ISTM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISTM charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISTM currently yields 14.27% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ISTM and IVV share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISTM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 13.89% | 0.15% | 13.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISTM or IVV?
ISTM has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ISTM or IVV?
Over the past year ISTM returned +49.67% vs +20.94% for IVV, so ISTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ISTM annualized +34.91% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ISTM or IVV?
ISTM has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ISTM -22.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ISTM and IVV?
ISTM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ISTM and IVV?
ISTM and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISTM or IVV?
ISTM yields 14.27% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ISTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.