ISVL vs IVV
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ISVL delivered stronger 1-year returns. ISVL offers more diversification with 538 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISVL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $335M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 538 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.64% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.49% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.68% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.77% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
ISVL vs IVV Performance
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ISVL returned +24.49% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ISVL is up 12.64% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ISVL compounded at +23.68% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.77% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ISVL has the edge at +12.02% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.5% for ISVL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISVL charges 0.31% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $3 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISVL currently yields 3.06% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ISVL and IVV share 1 holdings out of 1013 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISVL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.05% | 0.15% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISVL or IVV?
ISVL has an expense ratio of 0.31% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ISVL or IVV?
Over the past year ISVL returned +24.49% vs +20.94% for IVV, so ISVL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ISVL annualized +12.02% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ISVL or IVV?
ISVL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ISVL -30.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ISVL and IVV?
ISVL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ISVL and IVV?
ISVL and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1013 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISVL or IVV?
ISVL yields 3.06% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ISVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.