IVV vs JANT

IVV vs JANT

Which is better, IVV or JANT?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVJANT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.74%
AUM$876.4B$62M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings5085
YTD Return+14.14%Best+10.28%
1Y Return+17.30%Best+14.40%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.04%Best+17.13%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.63%Best+10.54%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%10.4%Best
Max Drawdown-24.5%-16.2%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,944Best$16,504
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)AllianzIM
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 31, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 4, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5.7 years).

IVV vs JANT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.

IVV vs JANT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while JANT returned +14.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a gain of 10.28% for JANT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.04% per year against +17.13% for JANT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.63% and +10.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.45% annualized vs +11.18%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.4% for JANT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -16.2% for JANT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while JANT charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for JANT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and JANT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVJANT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or JANT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JANT charges 0.74%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or JANT?

Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs +14.40% for JANT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +15.45% vs +11.18% for JANT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or JANT?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.4% for JANT. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs JANT -16.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and JANT?

IVV and JANT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JANT?

IVV yields 1.06% while JANT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JANT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.