IVV vs JGH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nuveen Global High Income Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 3.73% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 9.06% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 369 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +6.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +3.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +13.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +5.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -48.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nuveen | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 24, 2014 |
IVV vs JGH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while JGH returned +3.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 6.54% for JGH.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +13.06% for JGH; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +5.36% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JGH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -48.9% for JGH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JGH charges 3.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $373 annually, a gap of $370 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 9.06% for JGH.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JGH share 0 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JGH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JGH charges 3.73%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $370 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JGH?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +3.93% for JGH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +1.49% for JGH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JGH?
JGH has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JGH -48.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and JGH?
IVV and JGH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JGH?
IVV and JGH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JGH?
IVV yields 1.09% while JGH yields 9.06%, so JGH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.