IVV vs JIG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan International Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $470M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.39% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +16.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +2.91% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -43.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 20, 2020 |
IVV vs JIG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while JIG returned +21.64%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 13.52% for JIG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +16.14% for JIG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +2.91% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, JIG has the edge at +9.67% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -43.8% for JIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JIG charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.39% for JIG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JIG share 1 holdings out of 594 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NUVL | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JIG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JIG charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JIG?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +21.64% for JIG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +9.67% for JIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JIG?
JIG has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JIG -43.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and JIG?
IVV and JIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JIG?
IVV and JIG share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 594 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JIG?
IVV yields 1.09% while JIG yields 1.39%, so JIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.