IVV vs JPO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax JP Option Income Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JPO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.19% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $52M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 31.09% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 19 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +5.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +15.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +16.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 11, 2023 |
IVV vs JPO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax JP Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while JPO returned +15.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 5.70% for JPO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +16.46% for JPO. Across the full 3-year window we track, JPO has the edge at +16.46% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.8% for JPO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JPO charges 1.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $119 annually, a gap of $116 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 31.09% for JPO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JPO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JPO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JPO charges 1.19%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $116 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JPO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +15.81% for JPO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +16.46% for JPO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JPO?
JPO has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JPO -24.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and JPO?
IVV and JPO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JPO?
IVV and JPO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JPO?
IVV yields 1.10% while JPO yields 31.09%, so JPO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.