IVV vs JULJ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JULJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $14M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.45% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +0.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +0.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +4.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -12.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 3, 2023 |
IVV vs JULJ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while JULJ returned +0.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 0.27% for JULJ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +4.56% for JULJ. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.8% for JULJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -12.7% for JULJ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JULJ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.45% for JULJ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JULJ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JULJ charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JULJ?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +0.99% for JULJ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +0.21% for JULJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JULJ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.8% for JULJ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JULJ -12.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and JULJ?
IVV and JULJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JULJ?
IVV yields 1.10% while JULJ yields 4.45%, so JULJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.