IVV vs KLIP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KLIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $102M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 32.52% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -11.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -8.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +5.38% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 11, 2023 |
IVV vs KLIP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) is a ETF from KraneShares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while KLIP returned -8.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 11.23% for KLIP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +5.38% for KLIP. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for KLIP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.5% for KLIP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KLIP charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 32.52% for KLIP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KLIP share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KLIP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KLIP charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KLIP?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -8.14% for KLIP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +5.19% for KLIP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KLIP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for KLIP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KLIP -21.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and KLIP?
IVV and KLIP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KLIP?
IVV and KLIP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KLIP?
IVV yields 1.09% while KLIP yields 32.52%, so KLIP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.