IVV vs KPHO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares Dragon Capital Growth of Vietnam Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or KPHO?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KPHO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.02% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 11.09% |
| Holdings | 508 | 38 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | -8.94% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 3, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs KPHO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs KPHO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and KraneShares Dragon Capital Growth of Vietnam Index ETF (KPHO) is an ETF from KraneShares. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a loss of 8.94% for KPHO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KPHO charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $102 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 11.09% for KPHO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 34 in KPHO, totalling 99.3% and 73.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 34 in KPHO, against full books of 508 and 38.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and KPHO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KPHO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KPHO charges 1.02%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KPHO?
IVV yields 1.06% while KPHO yields 11.09%, so KPHO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KPHO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.