IVV vs KTF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs DWS Municipal Income Trust
Quick Verdict
IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KTF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | - | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $353M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 8.22% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 244 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +3.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +12.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +9.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | -0.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -60.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | DWS | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 20, 1988 |
IVV vs KTF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF) is a ETF from DWS. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while KTF returned +12.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 3.66% for KTF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +9.52% for KTF; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and -0.45% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -0.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.5% for KTF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -60.4% for KTF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KTF share 0 holdings out of 628 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, IVV or KTF?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +12.82% for KTF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs -0.11% for KTF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KTF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.5% for KTF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KTF -60.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and KTF?
IVV and KTF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KTF?
IVV and KTF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 628 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KTF?
IVV yields 1.09% while KTF yields 8.22%, so KTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.