IVV vs LDRI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LDRI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.10% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $22M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.54% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +2.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +2.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -0.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 7, 2024 |
IVV vs LDRI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while LDRI returned +2.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 2.05% for LDRI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.7% for LDRI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -0.8% for LDRI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LDRI charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $10 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.54% for LDRI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LDRI share 1 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LDRI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.15% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LDRI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LDRI charges 0.10%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LDRI?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +2.92% for LDRI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +4.43% for LDRI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LDRI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.7% for LDRI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LDRI -0.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and LDRI?
IVV and LDRI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LDRI?
IVV and LDRI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LDRI?
IVV yields 1.09% while LDRI yields 3.54%, so LDRI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.