IVV vs MART
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MART | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.74% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +10.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +16.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +15.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -11.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianzIM | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 28, 2023 |
IVV vs MART Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) is a ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while MART returned +16.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 10.28% for MART.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +15.85% for MART. Across the full 3-year window we track, MART has the edge at +16.93% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.8% for MART. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -11.6% for MART. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MART charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for MART.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MART?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MART charges 0.74%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MART?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +16.78% for MART, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +16.93% for MART. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MART?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.8% for MART. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MART -11.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and MART?
IVV and MART have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MART?
IVV yields 1.09% while MART yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.