IVV vs MAYT

IVV vs MAYT

Which is better, IVV or MAYT?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMAYT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.74%
AUM$876.4B$237M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings5085
YTD Return+12.39%Best+7.74%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+10.53%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best+14.67%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)12.8%6.6%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-12.0%Best
$10,000 over 3.4 years$19,254Best$15,941
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)AllianzIM
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Apr 28, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.4 years).

IVV vs MAYT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.

IVV vs MAYT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 May ETF (MAYT) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while MAYT returned +10.53%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 7.74% for MAYT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +14.67% for MAYT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 6.6% for MAYT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -12.0% for MAYT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MAYT charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MAYT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and MAYT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVMAYT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MAYT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MAYT charges 0.74%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or MAYT?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +10.53% for MAYT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or MAYT?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 6.6% for MAYT. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MAYT -12.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and MAYT?

IVV and MAYT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MAYT?

IVV yields 1.06% while MAYT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MAYT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.