IVV vs MAYZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MAYZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +11.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +14.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +15.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +8.80% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TrueShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 30, 2021 |
IVV vs MAYZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF (MAYZ) is a ETF from TrueShares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MAYZ returned +14.23%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 11.23% for MAYZ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +15.26% for MAYZ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +8.80% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, MAYZ has the edge at +9.30% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.8% for MAYZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.2% for MAYZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MAYZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.00% for MAYZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MAYZ share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MAYZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MAYZ charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MAYZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +14.23% for MAYZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +9.30% for MAYZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MAYZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.8% for MAYZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MAYZ -19.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and MAYZ?
IVV and MAYZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MAYZ?
IVV and MAYZ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MAYZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while MAYZ yields 2.00%, so MAYZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.