IVV vs METD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | METD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.02% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.48% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 38 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +0.55% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +17.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 29.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -46.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 5, 2024 |
IVV vs METD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while METD returned +17.75%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 0.55% for METD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -46.0% for METD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while METD charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $102 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.48% for METD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and METD share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or METD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while METD charges 1.02%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or METD?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +17.75% for METD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -14.51% for METD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or METD?
METD has been the more volatile fund at 29.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs METD -46.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and METD?
IVV and METD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and METD?
IVV and METD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or METD?
IVV yields 1.09% while METD yields 2.48%, so METD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.