IVV vs METD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, IVV or METD?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.55, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | METD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.02% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 508 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | -20.56% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | -7.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 33.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -48.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,931Best | $5,604 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.3 years).
IVV vs METD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs METD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while METD returned -7.31%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a loss of 20.56% for METD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.0% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -48.2% for METD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.55. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while METD charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $102 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.59% for METD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 3 in METD, totalling 99.3% and 87.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 3 in METD, against full books of 508 and 8.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and METD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or METD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while METD charges 1.02%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or METD?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs -7.31% for METD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +19.04% vs -22.26% for METD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or METD?
METD has been the more volatile fund at 33.0% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs METD -48.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and METD?
IVV and METD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.55, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or METD?
IVV yields 1.06% while METD yields 2.59%, so METD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is METD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.55, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.