IVV vs MINO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MINO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $726M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.87% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 425 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +1.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +5.98% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +4.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +1.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -15.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PIMCO (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 8, 2021 |
IVV vs MINO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) is a ETF from PIMCO (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MINO returned +5.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 1.34% for MINO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +4.46% for MINO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +1.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.7% for MINO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -15.2% for MINO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MINO charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.87% for MINO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MINO share 0 holdings out of 733 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MINO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MINO charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MINO?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +5.98% for MINO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +1.28% for MINO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MINO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.7% for MINO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MINO -15.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and MINO?
IVV and MINO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MINO?
IVV and MINO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 733 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MINO?
IVV yields 1.09% while MINO yields 3.87%, so MINO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.