IVV vs MLPA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Which is better, IVV or MLPA?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, MLPA over 1Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MLPA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 7.04% |
| Holdings | 508 | 22 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +24.78%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +26.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +18.23% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | +19.67%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 26.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -86.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262 | $24,543Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 18, 2012 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 19, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.4 years).
IVV vs MLPA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MLPA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while MLPA returned +26.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 24.78% for MLPA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +18.23% for MLPA; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +19.67% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.19% annualized vs -0.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MLPA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -86.2% for MLPA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MLPA charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $77 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 7.04% for MLPA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings MLPA also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for MLPA, our book for it lists positions totalling 109.1% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 20 in MLPA, against full books of 508 and 22.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MLPA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.08% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MLPA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MLPA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MLPA charges 0.77%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MLPA?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +26.55% for MLPA, so MLPA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +13.19% vs -0.22% for MLPA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MLPA?
MLPA has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs MLPA -86.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and MLPA?
IVV and MLPA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MLPA?
IVV yields 1.06% while MLPA yields 7.04%, so MLPA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MLPA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, MLPA over 1Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.