IVV vs MMIT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NYLIM MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF
Which is better, IVV or MMIT?
Large Cap Blend against Municipal Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MMIT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 4.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 856 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -1.58% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -0.21% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +2.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51%Best | +0.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 5.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -12.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,844Best | $10,212 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | New York Life Investments |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 18, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 18, 2017 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.9 years).
IVV vs MMIT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MMIT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NYLIM MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is an ETF from New York Life Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while MMIT returned -0.21%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 1.58% for MMIT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +2.92% for MMIT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and +0.42% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.00% annualized vs +1.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 5.0% for MMIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -12.3% for MMIT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MMIT charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.00% for MMIT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 397 in MMIT, totalling 99.3% and 48.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 397 in MMIT, against full books of 508 and 856.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MMIT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MMIT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MMIT charges 0.30%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MMIT?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -0.21% for MMIT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +14.00% vs +1.12% for MMIT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MMIT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 5.0% for MMIT. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs MMIT -12.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and MMIT?
IVV and MMIT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MMIT?
IVV yields 1.06% while MMIT yields 4.00%, so MMIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MMIT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.