IVV vs MNVT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Moonvest ETF
Which is better, IVV or MNVT?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MNVT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $74M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 23 |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +15.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 55.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Moonvest LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 17, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs MNVT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MNVT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Moonvest ETF (MNVT) is an ETF from Moonvest LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 15.34% for MNVT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MNVT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MNVT.
Holdings Overlap
6.1% of MNVT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
MNVT and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in MNVT, against full books of 508 and 23.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for MNVT that do not appear in our book for IVV (60.7% of the fund), and 481 for IVV that do not appear in MNVT (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MNVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc Common Stock USD.001 | 0.03% | 6.08% | 6.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MNVT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MNVT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MNVT charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MNVT?
6.1% of MNVT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 6.1% of MNVT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in MNVT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MNVT?
IVV yields 1.06% while MNVT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MNVT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.