IVV vs MOTI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Morningstar International Moat ETF
Which is better, IVV or MOTI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MOTI is less concentrated, with 29.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MOTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $75M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.15% |
| Holdings | 508 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | -5.18% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | -5.64% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +6.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +3.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 21.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -36.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $11,837 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 29.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 13, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2015 to Sep 10, 2026 (11.2 years).
IVV vs MOTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MOTI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while MOTI returned -5.64%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a loss of 5.18% for MOTI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +6.98% for MOTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +3.43% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.92% annualized vs +4.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -36.7% for MOTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MOTI charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.15% for MOTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings MOTI also owns. 2.0% of MOTI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
MOTI and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 46 in MOTI, against full books of 508 and 47.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for MOTI that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.0% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in MOTI (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MOTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMG:ASUniversal Music Group NV | 0.06% | 1.96% | 1.90% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MOTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MOTI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MOTI charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MOTI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs -5.64% for MOTI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +12.92% vs +4.53% for MOTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MOTI?
MOTI has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs MOTI -36.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and MOTI?
IVV and MOTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MOTI?
2.0% of MOTI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of MOTI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 46 in MOTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MOTI?
IVV yields 1.06% while MOTI yields 3.15%, so MOTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOTI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MOTI is less concentrated, with 29.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.