IVV vs MSII
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or MSII?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSII |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.54% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 64.93% |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6%Best | 55.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -78.7% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,488Best | $2,791 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 4, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 100 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 17, 2026 and MSII through Jun 9, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2025 to Jun 9, 2026 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSII has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.0% compared with 13.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -78.7% for MSII. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSII charges 1.54%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $154 annually, a gap of $151 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 64.93% for MSII.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 1 in MSII, totalling 99.3% and 4.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 243 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and MSII as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in MSII, against full books of 508 and 11.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MSII you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSII?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSII charges 1.54%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $151 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSII?
MSII has been the more volatile fund at 55.0% annualized versus 13.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs MSII -78.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSII?
IVV and MSII have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSII?
IVV yields 1.06% while MSII yields 64.93%, so MSII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSII better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.