IVV vs MSII
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSII | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.54% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 64.93% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -33.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -73.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 55.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -78.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 4, 2025 |
IVV vs MSII Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) is a ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MSII returned -73.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 33.95% for MSII.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSII has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -78.7% for MSII. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSII charges 1.54%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $154 annually, a gap of $151 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 64.93% for MSII.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSII share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSII?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSII charges 1.54%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $151 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSII?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -73.46% for MSII, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -72.09% for MSII. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSII?
MSII has been the more volatile fund at 55.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSII -78.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSII?
IVV and MSII have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSII?
IVV and MSII share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSII?
IVV yields 1.09% while MSII yields 64.93%, so MSII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.