IVV vs MSOS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.78% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $837M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | -3.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | -1.49% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | -2.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | -33.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 72.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -96.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Advisor Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 1, 2020 |
IVV vs MSOS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) is a ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while MSOS returned -1.49%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a loss of 3.34% for MSOS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against -2.08% for MSOS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and -33.67% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -24.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSOS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -96.3% for MSOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSOS charges 0.78%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $78 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for MSOS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSOS share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSOS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSOS charges 0.78%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSOS?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs -1.49% for MSOS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -24.52% for MSOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSOS?
MSOS has been the more volatile fund at 72.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSOS -96.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSOS?
IVV and MSOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSOS?
IVV and MSOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSOS?
IVV yields 1.09% while MSOS yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.