IVV vs MSOX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSOX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.97% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $46M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -41.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -75.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | -62.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 163.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -99.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AdvisorShares Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 23, 2022 |
IVV vs MSOX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF (MSOX) is a ETF from AdvisorShares Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MSOX returned -75.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 41.83% for MSOX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against -62.22% for MSOX. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -74.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 163.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -99.8% for MSOX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSOX charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $97 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for MSOX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSOX share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSOX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSOX charges 0.97%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSOX?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -75.35% for MSOX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -74.15% for MSOX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSOX?
MSOX has been the more volatile fund at 163.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSOX -99.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSOX?
IVV and MSOX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSOX?
IVV and MSOX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSOX?
IVV yields 1.09% while MSOX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.