IVV vs MTYY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF
Which is better, IVV or MTYY?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MTYY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.07% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 249.17% |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | -35.97% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | -69.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4%Best | 34.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs MTYY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MTYY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF (MTYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while MTYY returned -69.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a loss of 35.97% for MTYY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MTYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.7% compared with 13.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MTYY charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 249.17% for MTYY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MTYY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MTYY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MTYY charges 1.07%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MTYY?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs -69.43% for MTYY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MTYY?
MTYY has been the more volatile fund at 34.7% annualized versus 13.4% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and MTYY?
IVV and MTYY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MTYY?
IVV yields 1.06% while MTYY yields 249.17%, so MTYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MTYY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.