IVV vs MYCL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MYCL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $12M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.69% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 109 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -0.01% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +3.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 3.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -4.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2024 |
IVV vs MYCL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCL) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while MYCL returned +3.05%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 0.01% for MYCL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.8% for MYCL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -4.0% for MYCL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MYCL charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.69% for MYCL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MYCL share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MYCL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MYCL charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MYCL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +3.05% for MYCL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +3.19% for MYCL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MYCL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.8% for MYCL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MYCL -4.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and MYCL?
IVV and MYCL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MYCL?
IVV and MYCL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MYCL?
IVV yields 1.10% while MYCL yields 4.69%, so MYCL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.